I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

<12

Support needed

User
Posted 16 Jul 2023 at 17:06

You knew before the op that there was a good chance of needing adjuvant RT so in that sense, the pathology shouldn't be a big surprise. The question is why the surgeon was willing to go ahead with the op when many would have advised against it and recommended going straight to RT/HT with or without brachytherapy boost - but he & your husband obviously thought it was worth the risk.

Just because there were positive margins doesn't necessarily mean that there is loads of cancer left behind - the PSA test is a good indicator and it is possible that the positive margins were actually removed with the rest of the gland as they are quite small.

Re the tadalafil, two possible explanations. 1) it has been prescribed automatically by someone eho hasn't read his notes and hasn't realised he was non nerve-sparing or 2) it is because tadalifil brings oxygenated blood to the whole pelvic area which helps with healing generally. 

Edited by member 16 Jul 2023 at 17:09  | Reason: Not specified

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 16 Jul 2023 at 18:21

Tulippy, sorry you find yourself in this situation.I had surgery at 62 and post surgery I was upgraded from T2* to T3a , but my Gleason was only 4+3. I did have positive margins and extra prostatic extension. My post op PSA was 0.03 but about 33 months after surgery my PSA breached 0.2 and at 0.27 three years after surgery,I started salvage RT without HT. 

SRT didn't completely work for me and five years after SRT,I had my first course of SABR treatment to a single lymph node. A few months ago ( nine years after surgery) I started six months of bicalutamide and had a second course of SABR treatment to another pelvic lymph node, I now await the outcome.

Detection methods have improved in the last few years and my SRT was done on the basis of "an educated guess based on years of experience and data". 

I was supposedly non nerve sparring, but I do still get the odd surprise.

Lots of tools still in the box, so stay positive.

Thanks Chris 

 

User
Posted 16 Jul 2023 at 19:26
Great post Chris 👍
User
Posted 16 Jul 2023 at 19:30

Bit harsh Lyn! Whilst tulippy knew that rt was highly likely, seeing the histology in black and white and trying to process all the facts whilst remaining positive is a different story! 

User
Posted 16 Jul 2023 at 19:34

Tuilippy, I was stage T3b (PSA 37, Gleason 4+3) on diagnosis and also opted for (partial nerve sparing) RP. My post op histology came back with a positive margin and a PSA of 0.28. I knew this outcome was always a possibility but it is nevertheless a huge blow after getting over surgery.

Once your OH gets the PSA result (and depending on the score) they may look to doing a scan such as a PSMA PET scan to detect any residual cancer. I know that any aches or pains at this stage do immediately make you think it's bone mets but that's unlikely to be the case. I ended up having six months of HT plus SRT to the prostate bed last October. So far my PSA has been undetectable. So don't despair, there is still a curable pathway open to your OH.

User
Posted 16 Jul 2023 at 20:20
Thank you to all of you for your support and advice, no matter what I just want honesty.

Chris you have lifted me a lot tonight 👍🏻

OH and myself still feel RARP was best decision at the time, and still now, as it’s got rid of most of the nasty stuff.

I understand now positive margins might not be as bad as I’m thinking and starting radiotherapy asap is the best option.

Does anyone know what a bad PSA result on Thursday would be? And does higher number mean more cancer is there, more than a lower number?

I read somewhere that someone said chemotherapy with the radiotherapy has better outcomes…is this an option we should bring up on Thursday?

Thank you again…just pouring myself more wine 😫

Take care,

Tulippy 🌹 x

User
Posted 19 Jul 2023 at 17:50

I’ve had a lazy day and been on this wonderful site trying to look how we can make the best of tomorrow’s appointment, when we will find out OH’s PSA following unsuccessful RARP.
I know surgeon suggested few weeks back that adjuvant radiotherapy was next but after all my reading today I want to ask about having a PSMA before that treatment is started.
I know this will be dependent on his PSA but even if it’s low (below 0.2) I feel somewhere in my gut this might be beneficial, at his staging and high risk.
Any advice on this before I make myself look like a fool in there tomorrow will be greatly appreciated :)
OH has no idea about all this…total head in the sand therefore I also am feeling the added stress of making sure best decisions are being made.
Thanks 🙏🏻

Edited by member 19 Jul 2023 at 17:51  | Reason: Not specified

Take care,

Tulippy 🌹 x

User
Posted 19 Jul 2023 at 18:41

Tulippy, my RARP, didn't eradicate my cancer but based on my post Op PSA it removed 99.7 of it. Removing the mother ship is often described as flawed thinking, I don't know. The senior onco at my hospital was a guest speaker at a support meeting and he believes in removal of the mother ship. Added,My prostate was removed with curative intent.

My salvage RT was given without a PSMA scan and although there was something in the prostate bed there was obviously something outside the bed.

Lots of debates on when to apply treatment.

Hope all goes well.

Thanks Chris 

 

Edited by member 19 Jul 2023 at 19:05  | Reason: Clarity

User
Posted 19 Jul 2023 at 18:51

Im in agreement too Chris, always wise to remove the source if possible.

User
Posted 19 Jul 2023 at 20:07

Thank you Chris. Are you saying that because something was outside the prostate bed you would have benefited from a PSMA before adjuvant radiotherapy?

This is what I’m trying to understand, if we should push for a PSMA?

Kind words from you all, I’m having a bad night, cried because I couldn’t do a bin bag up!, and you all are helping me so much x

Take care,

Tulippy 🌹 x

User
Posted 19 Jul 2023 at 20:59

I had a PSMA PET scan prior to my salvage radiotherapy. At the time of the scan my PSA would have been around 0.4 but the scan results were inconclusive. This can end up being the case and I've heard quoted the the success rate with this type of scan being about 80%. It's not available everywhere and which type of radioactive tracer you get tends to be depend on where you go. There are pros and cons with each type of tracer but you are unlikely to get a choice in the matter. It can certainly help pinpoint the cancer but there is no guarantee. The prostate bed is a likely source of the cancer if your OH has positive margins but with a T3b diagnosis it could also be in local lymph nodes. Did the RARP include adjunctive removal of local lymph nodes? If not then they may consider RT to whole pelvis rather than  just the prostate bed.

User
Posted 19 Jul 2023 at 22:46

Tulippy, my salvage RT was three years after surgery so there is probably a difference in our situations, but you won't know until tomorrow. So six years ago I was being advised by the members on here to get a PSMA scan. Back then they were not used as much as now. My oncologist said no and at the time my surgeon said if they found something outside the prostate bed then then salvage RT would no longer be offered and it would be straight onto HT, thankfully things have changed. 

My oncologist said RT to the prostate bed was "an educated guess based on years of experience and data" . My PSA went from 0.27 down to 0.04 then slowly crept up again so it is possible the cause of the 0.4 was outside the prostate bed. We were going to wait until the PSA hit 8 or 10 before having further treatment or a PSMA scan but advances in scanning and perhaps a push from me meant I had a PSMA scan last year at 1.4.

Nothing was seen in the prostate bed but a lymph node lit up. So either the SRT killed all the cells in the prostate bed or they are too small to see. The lymph node was treated with 5 SABR treatments in August last year but PSA continued to rise and another PSMA scan in April this year lit up another tumor and showed a residue in the tumor detected last year. I had another 5 SABR treatments to the new tumor in June and started on six months of bicalutamide.

I am quite happy to have treatment after treatment rather than go to a life time of HT. The second lot of SABR was paid by my wife's work health insurance and it is not cheap, but the oncologist has more options in the private sector.

I was upgraded to T3a after surgery, had positive margins a extra prostatic extension.It took nearly three years for my PSA to reach 0.2 and was 0.27 when I started SRT.

I just keep on going, I have a philosophy when faced with a problem, can I do anything about it ? if no ,there is no point worrying,if yes get on and do it. Stay positive.

I really hope you get a good result tomorrow.

Thanks Chris 

User
Posted 20 Jul 2023 at 01:38
With that pathology, a PSMA scan isn't really necessary and, in the long run, could put you in a worse position. It seems they are already planning to give adjuvant RT which will take out the bulk of whatever has been left in the prostate bed (if anything has been left). If you had a PSMA scan and it found PCa further afield, the possibility of adjuvant RT might disappear and he could be left with lifelong HT as his only real option. Giving the adjuvant RT / HT a whirl and seeing how it goes might suit your disposition better as it matches your decision to go for the RP knowing it might not be successful?

The PSA tomorrow might be significant or it might not. If it is greater than 0.1 I would expect a referral straight to oncology. If it is less than 0.1, you could ask to wait and see how the PSA goes over the next few months and only seek a referral to oncology if it rises. My husband had a poor pathology but he was in denial and refused to be referred to oncology until he absolutely had to - in effect, he had two years to recover from the RP before he had to face RT / HT. It wouldn't suit everyone but worked for him. That was nearly 12 years ago.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 20 Jul 2023 at 11:41

Thank you Lyn, can I just clarify something…are you saying if he has a PSMA scan and it finds PCa somewhere else, they would then not offer him adjuvant RT? 
I don’t want to suggest a PSMA and then to have his options taken away. 
Thanks, as always, for any advice, such a quick steep learning curve I’m on!!!

Take care,

Tulippy 🌹 x

User
Posted 20 Jul 2023 at 15:52
Not a definite but certainly a possibility. If the PSMA scan found left over cells in the prostate bed and one or two ribs lit up like a beacon, some oncos would still be prepared to offer aRT and might even agree to aRT plus direct RT to the rib. That depends a bit on whether SABR / cyberknife is available in your Trust and approved by your ICB. If the PSMA scan identified a number of mets, the oncologist may advise that aRT is pointless because the cat is already out of the bag.

I am pretty sure that you would be able to cope with either of those scenarios - the thing that I wouldn't be so happy to risk is the PSMA scan coming back clear and medics advising to do nothing except repeat the scan in 6 or 12 months to see if something shows up then.

It is a question about personality and approach to risk, isn't it. My husband would not want any treatment unless he absolutely had to do it. There is no way he would have agreed to surgery knowing he would probably have to have RT anyway. I wouldn't want him to have a PSMA scan and then not be able to get travel insurance and have to stop doing the things he loves. You have a very different outlook - treat what we can and if more treatment is needed, so be it. On that basis, you have to balance the risk - don't ask for a PSMA or Axumin scan so that the aRT is definitely offered OR go for the PSMA / Axumin scan and hope that it finds one or two hotspots that can be treated. A clear scan puts you in no man's land and a scan lit up like a Christmas tree means no radical treatment offered.

Then there is one other consideration - how far would you have to travel for a PSMA or Axumin scan / how long might you have to wait / can you afford it if not available on the NHS?

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 21 Jul 2023 at 17:29

This is tough - at yesterday's 6 week follow up the consultant hit us with the news that PSA is still 9.

That's the same as before the RARP.

Prescribe 50mg Bicalutamide to OH (who ran to the chemist to get it and opened the pack and took a tablet before even leaving the pharmacy!!)

We were then just waiting for appointment to see oncologist and discuss start of radiotherapy treatment

However today he had a call out of the blue from the consultant who said after discussion with the onco they want him to go for PSMA scan asap.

I did mention a scan in yesterday's meeting but consultant said it would not be beneficial - obviously changed his mind!!

I'm all over the place and don't know what to think.

Any advice would be great.

Thank you so much.

Take care,

Tulippy 🌹 x

User
Posted 21 Jul 2023 at 18:15
That's a lot of PSA - unlikely to be just some leftovers in the prostate bed. Did they say just bicalutimide or did they suggest hormone injections starting in a couple of weeks as well?
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 21 Jul 2023 at 18:41

Hi Lyn,

Hormone implant in couple of weeks.

I imagine he’s spoken to oncologist who has gone whoooaaa!!

What the hell is going on??

I’m just trying to take some comfort from the fact that 9 isn’t mega high…?

Take care,

Tulippy 🌹 x

User
Posted 21 Jul 2023 at 19:45
Okay - so just keep on top of them to ensure the PSMA scan is done without too much delay. Once the injections start, any mets should start to shrink and will be harder to spot on the scan. If it was my husband, I would probably also ask for a separate bone scan and, if the PSMA scan comes back clear or equivocal, a choline PET scan as well.
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 21 Jul 2023 at 21:35

Tulippy, I can't say I have ever seen a PSA result that was almost the same pre op as post op. Being an optimist I would suspect there was an error, perhaps clutching at straws here. Are you sure the post op result is not 0.9, and are you sure they have not read the previous result. 0.9 would still warrant action. Could he have been saying oh was still Gleason 9, post histology Gleason scores can go up or down.

My pre op PSA was 10, G 4+3, my histology was positive margins and extra prostatic extension but my post op PSA was 0.03. 

Thanks Chris 

 
Forum Jump  
<12
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK