I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

<123>

NHS or private health?

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 09:56

Some consider  gleason score of 3+3 as precancerous rather than cancer so there is a risk of over treatment ?

Do  you drink  cows milk and consume alot of saturated fat - there are many things you can easily switch in your diet to try to  prevent pca from progressing 

Edited by member 07 Jan 2025 at 09:56  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 10:39

I am in the same situation, diagnosed with Gleason 3+3, in all quadrants, T2(c). It was recent (2 weeks ago), so I am debating what and how. Currently went into AS in the interim.

I agree on diet and what we can do ourselves to slow it. This is in our hands. I moved into a more focused diet, to do whatever I can in my control.

What troubles is whether there are other grades in the prostate that were not sampled (identified in the MRI scan) or whether in a few years from now, I'd regret not doing something early. The $1M question.

Something I guess everyone of us with Gleason 6 is facing.

But, in the grand scheme of things, I feel privileged, with all the personal stories here in the forum. All we can do is support each other and make our own decisions. Sooner or later.

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 11:09

Hi JohnnyReal.

I'm sorry to see that youve had to join our club, but welcome to the forum mate.

Four years ago, I was diagnosed Gleason 6 (3+3), T2c. I was on active surveillance for almost 2 years before they discovered disease progression. This link tells my story:

https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/posts/t29997-T2c-disease-and-active-surveillance

On hindsight, as I now know it is very rare for a true Gleason score to get worse, I believe I was unlucky and that my initial biopsy missed the more aggressive cancer cells.

Active surveillance is increasingly being used to try and prevent over treatment.

https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2022/prostate-cancer-active-surveillance-increasing

Although my AS failed, the majority do not. If this option is offered to you, please just ensure, particularly with a T2c staging  that you are properly monitored. 

Good luck mate 👍 

Edited by member 07 Jan 2025 at 15:30  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 11:15

Thanks buddy!

I read your story and others, this forum is a gold mine for gathering information and perspective. 🙏

This is exactly the scenario I'd say I am nervous about - that the (only one so far) biopsy I did, missed something. I am less concerned about what was found, if this makes sense.

Agree 100% on active and proper monitoring. I am about to see a specialist, via NHS referral, just for another pair of eyes to look at my case, before I decide what's next.

Thanks for your and everyone's support!

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 11:27

Hi Johnny

I was G3+3 on initial diagnosis. Then G3+4 after targeted biopsy and finally G4+3 on post RALP pathology.

Given that I am told Gleason scores do not change, that implies plenty of scope for error or more probably omission.

Peter

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 11:51
Whilst much of the NHS is broken, esp Dentistry - My experience is their Cancer treatment is first rate.

Probably because speed before Cancer spreads, is so important. Spread causes many other complications, that the NHS prefers to avoid - better for the patient, too.

Once your on the chemotherapy pathway, usually it is just a matter of time, though there are exceptions of course.

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 13:15

Peter

Therein lies the problem. Just look at the number of times people are upgraded after surgery. In my husband’s case his biopsy results reflected the main tumour in the prostate 3:4. Biopsy said 20% pattern 4 following surgery they said 25% pattern 4. However three further small tumours were identified that were not seen on MPMRI or discovered by biopsy. One was 4:3, the other 3:3 and another 3:4 with 5% pattern 4. His overall grading remained 3:4.

However the whole grading of tumours particularly Gleason score 7 is a bit of a mystery. Is a tumour 10 mm with 25% pattern 4  ( ie 3:4) better than a tumour 2mm with 80% pattern 4? ( ie 4:3) 

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 15:31

Hello - its a good question. i had poor experience on the NHS hospital, having results lost and the biopsies done in what felt like a back office under local. i flipped to private work healthcare - not something i agree with but in this case i had to really. the main difference is having time with the consultants, they are more prepared for the meetings, they listen longer and in my experience do not get frustrated with my constant questions! i had an RP and selected the consultant whom i had been recommended and just felt less rushed! in recovery now and awaiitng first PSA test. having said that, my mother has been in hospital for NHS surgery and its bene great, just thrown out very quickly with poor after care. probably not helpful but thats my experience. 

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 15:43

Hi Adrian- i wanted to thank you for many of your comments and messages here. i have been following the site since RP on November 19th and reading peoples experiences and treatment. it has been very encouraging to read people's experiences and the support through messages.

i had been on surveillance from 2021 to summer 2024; i had opted to go private and new results came in and the consultant said that the cancer was 'misbehaving' and needed to get going with treatment. at that time it was Stage 1-2; 3 cores 4,3, but fully contained. however after surgery, there was another area that had been high grade PIN that in the space of 12 months on the NHS had progressed into the seminal vesical duct route from the base of the prostate but with otherwise fully clear capsule, and neurosafe allowed full nerve sparing. biopsy showed full clear margins, no node involvement. i was shocked to hear the seminal issue as this hadnt been detected. i face the PSA test next week to assess how its gone, and im more anxious now than before surgery, and other biopsy/MRI scans..!

interestingly, during all my consultant meetings, i always asked "what would you do, if you were me" and this allowed me to understand what the consultant would do. obviously not always the best choice but we had developed trust and there was always time to discuss things. i also knew more due to my dads own diagnosis in 2021 and we lost him to PC in 2022. the consultant also drew things for me and also talked through the scans, my 23mm urethra (which he was pleased about). i was aware that the consultants approach was "i am a cutting man, my man, where possible" and he had conducted 3000+ robot and around 60 single point robotic surgeries. i was able to have single point robotic surgery and back at work just before christmas. 

thanks 

User
Posted 07 Jan 2025 at 16:08

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

 

interestingly, during all my consultant meetings, i always asked "what would you do, if you were me" and this allowed me to understand what the consultant would do.

Interestingly enough, that question "what would you do..." and the answer helped me crystallize a way forward with my treatment options. I am not going to bore you with my story, in a nutshell, I explored a number of treatment options post diagnosis and seemed to settle for either the RARP or HIFU. I was already in the queue for surgery, when I read an article about HIFU at the UCLH. Anyway, I had to perform another biopsy to ascertain if I was eligible for this treatment. As usual, I got a telephone call from the consultant to discuss the results, and even though I was eligible, I could tell he was not 100% convinced... I was GL 3+4 on one side and 3+3 on the other... I was 55 at the time. So confused as to which way to go, I asked the question and his answer was given my age, he would go for surgery, that was all I needed to hear!

Edited by member 07 Jan 2025 at 16:09  | Reason: sp

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 00:39

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Some consider  gleason score of 3+3 as precancerous rather than cancer so there is a risk of over treatment ?

Do  you drink  cows milk and consume alot of saturated fat - there are many things you can easily switch in your diet to try to  prevent pca from progressing 

I read similar in 2019. Decided to check it out myself….looking at various research papers from pathology labs type 3 cells are very much cancer cells in every sense. They are also very much capable of metastasis although less likely at this stage. It’s also worth noting that although a biopsy comes back as Gleason 6 (3+3) in ~44% of cases this grading is usually upgraded with post surgery histology,

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 09:48

TechGuy, it's also worth noting that my consultant urologist wasn't really impressed by my upgrading from G3+4 to G4+3. He said that if G4 is there at all there is an increased risk of spread and this should be considered in choice of treatment. 

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 09:54

Hi gee_baba - i asked about HiFu also, thinking and reading that it was possibly an easier and less intrusive option. the NHS consultant in the brief five minutes he spared me said possibly but wasn't sure. when i went to the private consultant, he said i could look into it but felt that with the grading of what they had found albeit small, he felt that there was a high chance there would be other satellite PC - he said rarely one area. he had prefaced his conversations with him being a PS surgeon and that his primary course of action for me, at my age, (51) and being in his words very fit and healthy was surgery. he was concerned that hifu and other local therapy options woudl lead me to more treatments, more biopsy and MRI work. He added was closely following the whole aspect of the treatments, that it wasnt widely supported but that he was open and in dialogue. as mentioend before, i asked what he'd do! the consultant rehab meetings (yes, i didnt know there was a hting until went private) talked about single versus multi port, and i asked her what she would do, and she said if i was her brother or husband she'd go single port due to recovery time and being back up and running. but with all of these things, its very specific to individuals, health, history and mental approach (and the consultant!). i had made clear that after 3 years of AS and a change, i wanted physical removal as primary treatment. 

 

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 09:54

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Some consider  gleason score of 3+3 as precancerous rather than cancer so there is a risk of over treatment ?

Do  you drink  cows milk and consume alot of saturated fat - there are many things you can easily switch in your diet to try to  prevent pca from progressing 

I read similar in 2019. Decided to check it out myself….looking at various research papers from pathology labs type 3 cells are very much cancer cells in every sense. They are also very much capable of metastasis although less likely at this stage. It’s also worth noting that although a biopsy comes back as Gleason 6 (3+3) in ~44% of cases this grading is usually upgraded with post surgery histology,

It would be helpful if you could  post a link to the evidence that 44% of gleason 3+3 is upgraded post surgery 

 

Edited by member 08 Jan 2025 at 10:45  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 09:59

i havent read anywhere that GL 3,3 isn't cancer but more likely to be watched under Active Surveillance. interestingly, my first biopsy found 3 cores of 3,3 and the year later biopsy only showed 2 cores of only a small area of 4, and coudln't be classified properly. the consultant said the accuracy of the cores and positioning means that there are 5mm gaps around core samples so small areas can be missed.my next biopsy showed an area of 4,3.  i'm unsure of the numbers of upgrading, but my experience was that the GL was 4,3 at my last biopsy and after RP they discovered small ductal spread into the seminal vesicals. i had lived in hope that my PC was slow or low grade but it was starting to change at the end of a 3 year period. 

Edited by member 08 Jan 2025 at 10:01  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 10:07

I think this might be the research that suggests up to 40% of Gleason 6 can be upgraded following surgery. For swiftness you can scan down to conclusion but like all research the entire article needs to be read for context.

 

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3921736/#:~:text=GS%206%20detected%20in%20biopsy,biopsy%20score%207%20%5B2%5D.

 

I suspect many people could also provide research that counters this research

Edited by member 08 Jan 2025 at 10:09  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 11:26

We are veering away from Mark61's question which was - will private treatment be more or less than NHS treatment 

All links to  GS 6 prognosis  so far have cited US data 

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 11:32

Lizzo

 

You asked for evidence of research. Research is not only valid if undertaken in the UK.

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 11:48

Definitely veered off topic. To continue discussion on Gleason scores, a new thread should be created. 

 

User
Posted 08 Jan 2025 at 12:06

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Definitely veered off topic. To continue discussion on Gleason scores, a new thread should be created. 

Great minds think alike, Pete. 🙂

That's why I started this thread yesterday.

https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/posts/t31263-Inaccurate-biopsy-results

 

 
Forum Jump  
<123>
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK