I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

12>

Worried about impact of treatment on heart

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 08:26

Hi everyone, I’m new to this forum and I’m looking for any advice around treatment options for people who also have an existing heart condition.

My husband (aged 54) has just been diagnosed with PCa Gleason 6, T3a PSA 3.51. I’ve been reading about the impact of HT on the heart and I was looking for some advice/words of support as I’m very worried due to my husband already having an existing heart condition. Having the operation isn’t an option because of his condition but now I’m concerned the HT won’t be safe either. We’re meeting the oncologist in a couple of weeks but we really don’t know what will be the best treatment path for him. He is otherwise fit and well and maintains a healthy weight. 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated, thanks 

 



User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 10:24

Gleason 6 T3a is a little bit of a unusual combination, which might call the Gleason 6 into question a bit.

Being T3a, they will probably still want to hit it quite hard.

The higher power radiotherapy treatments delivered over shorter periods benefit less from hormone therapy, so you might ask about something like HDR Brachytherapy where a shorter or even no dose of HT might be required. This can be combined with a reduced dose of external beam which can help to mop up any undetected micro-mets around the prostate, and this combination is called HDR Boost although the external beam would benefit from some HT. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR/SBRT) might be another option with less need for HT. Some places might also consider LDR Brachytherapy depending if they think they can catch the T3a (locally advanced) part with it. With a Gleason 6, they wouldn't normally do HT, but being T3a, I would question if he's really Gleason 6.

If he does have HT, there are a few types. The tablets (Bicalutamide) have fewer side effects with the exception of higher risk of breast gland growth. The GnRH Agonist injections (Prostap, Zoladex, Decapeptyl) are more powerful and effective, but do have risks of coronary issues. The GnRH Antagonist injection (Firmagon/Degarelix) is similar to the other injections in effectiveness, slightly less risk of coronary issues, but is a less pleasant injection and given more frequently (and much more expensive). I don't know how the tablets compare with the injections for coronary issues, but unlike the injections, they don't tend to raise blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood glucose, so they may be better.

Obviously something to discuss with your oncologist. Brachytherapy and Stereotactic radiotherapy are only available at some centres. If your centre doesn't do them, they will probably not be experts in their suitability and you would have to ask for a referral elsewhere if you wanted to ask more about those treatments.

Edited by member 31 Oct 2022 at 10:29  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 10:42
I would take the oncologist's advice. He or she is a medical expert. People on an Internet forum are not. I'm sure that whatever advice your husband is given will be very carefully considered.

Best wishes,

Chris

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 10:51

Thanks Andy and Chris, we too were a bit unsure why you would receive a Gleason score of 6 with T3a. The urologist said it was T2/T3a as the cancer is pressing on the edge of the capsule so they couldn’t be sure if it had broken through so I’m assuming they rounded it up to T3a.  Has anyone else had that happen, I was just wondering if it’s quite common? We’ve tried to take comfort that it means it slow growing but at the moment it’s just a worry as we read and hear a lot of contradicting information.

That’s really helpful advice about all the treatment options, we are going to take a load of notes with us so we can ask all the relevant questions and make sure we have some background knowledge of the different treatments available. The urologist did say the oncologist may decide to just start RT straightaway or use HT for two to three weeks either side of the RT which she might have suggested as an option due to my husbands heart condition.

Lots to think (and worry) about before the appointment but I’m sure there are sadly many men diagnosed with PCa who have existing heart problems so we will have to put our trust in the professionals as I’m sure they will know what they are doing 

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 11:05

The Gleason score shows how aggressive the cancer is. The stage shows how much it's spread. The combination of T3 and G6 probably means that it's been slowly growing for a very long time (perhaps decades). By the time it gets to T3 it really is pretty essential to get treatment. It's possible that the oncologist could recommend radiotherapy without HT if the HT is felt to be potentially damaging to the heart, but I'd wait and see what the advice is. Treatment recommendations are made by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting at which all the relevant experts (in your case presumably including a cardiologist) will get together and reach a consensus about the best way forward.

Best wishes,

Chris

Edited by member 31 Oct 2022 at 11:07  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 11:11

Thanks for explaining, it was all a bit of a shock as my husband has had no symptoms at all and it got picked up through routine blood tests so we do consider him to be lucky as it may have become far more advanced by the time any symptoms started to develop.  Sorry to ask another question but do you know if that meeting would take place prior to us meeting with the oncologist ? It’s the waiting that’s frustrating my husband more than anything and we were both hoping that appointment would confirm the treatment plan and get it started. Many thanks 

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 12:17

I was similar, in that they couldn't tell if I was T2c with it causing bulging of the prostate, or T3a having broken through just outside the prostate - scans weren't clear enough to tell. I was treated as for T3a (but was G 3+4=7, and PSA 58, so different in other respects).

With you possibly only just being T3a and G 6, they may go with some less aggressive treatments, such as LDR brachytherapy without HT.

The MDT have already met - the urologist was feeding back their suggestions (urology run the prostate MDTs, although oncology will have been there too). The MDT will discuss your case every time there's been any change since their last weekly meeting, whether that be test results back, or you having made a decision, or a clinician wanting to raise your case again for any other reason.

Edited by member 31 Oct 2022 at 12:19  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 12:30

In answer to one of your questions. I was diagnosed T2b prior to my prostatectomy. After post op pathology, I was graded T3a, even though I had clear margins and the tumour, whilst pressing against the capsule, had not broken through. Without removing the prostate, I imagine that all diagnoses are liable to a margin of error. 

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 12:51

Thanks Andy and Peter, hopefully they will decide on a less aggressive treatment path, it’s good to know that conversation will have already taken place so it sounds like we’ll be able to hear which path they think is the safest and most appropriate to take. We just want to get started with the treatment.

Ive read the operation can be done under an epidural, do you know of anyone who has had their prostate removed this way? I still think my husband would prefer to not be operated on, and I can’t imagine being awake would be very pleasant at all, but we’re just exploring all options, many thanks 

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 13:39
Waiting is what almost everyone finds to be the hardest part of the entire process; once there's a definite treatment plan in place you know where you stand and, assuming the treatment is done with curative intent (which from what you've said, your husband's will be) you can look forward to getting the treatment over with and getting on with your lives.

Finding out that you have prostate cancer with no symptoms due to an unrelated blood test is extremely common, by the way. Exactly the same thing happened to me aged 56, so much the same age as your husband. Four years later and everything's (fingers crossed!) sorted and I've never enjoyed life more. A cancer diagnosis makes you focus on what's important in life 🙂.

All the best,

Chris

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 13:50

Thanks Chris, they’re really positive words and it’s great to hear you have gone on to make a fully recovery 😊 we are definitely finding the waiting difficult and my husband is ready to crack on with the treatment.  Just out of interest, which treatment path did you take? I know my husband’s heart condition will play a huge factor but I’m really interested in what options people take.  

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 14:48
I had six months' hormone therapy followed by six weeks of RT and another year of HT.

Best wishes,

Chris

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 15:06

Thanks Chris, a long journey but great to hear it had the desired outcome 😊

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 15:11
In this situation I would seek an opinion from my heart surgeon on how seriously GA and the various treatments could affect me. Also you could ask a surgeon about a spinal block rather than GA. It might even be helpful if your heart consultant speaks directly to those responsible for your PCa options.

Not everybody has HT with RT, although the use of HT combined with RT does help improve results. Very few people find it difficult to tolerate EBRT and it is the HT that usually accompanies it, that tends to cause more varied and severe side effects. Also, less likely with a Gleason of 3+3 but still possible that you might need RT to deal with any cancer cells that surgery has missed,

Barry
User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 15:12
It was a long journey but, other than at the start, HT didn't really feel like "treatment". I just took a tablet every morning and that was that. It was only the latter stages of the radiotherapy where it all got a bit unpleasant, but that only lasted a few weeks and it was never more than mildly inconvenient.

Best wishes,

Chris

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 15:55

Thanks Barry, my husband isn’t under a cardiologist anymore, he just has a scan every 2 years which again we see as a positive and hopefully he will be fit enough to respond to the treatment. We are hoping he will be back under the care of a cardiologist during his treatment though to make sure his heart health is all ok.  We have a lot of questions to ask when we see the oncologist and the responses in this thread are really helpful, I appreciate you all taking the time to answer our questions.

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 16:01

Thanks Chris, we have been reading about the side effects and it sounds like it’s hit and miss on who experiences these.  It’s great to hear you weren’t particularly impacted by the HT. The RT sounds worse, especially with what you have to do every day to prepare for it, however, it sounds like a very successful treatment and you are proof of this.  We know it will be a long journey but we are trying to stay positive and I’m sure there will be a treatment suitable for my husband’s heart condition. 

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 21:28
Because you go to RT sessions at the same time, Monday to Friday, for weeks on end, you very quickly get into the swing of things. You meet the same people in the waiting room every day and you get to know them and the nurses. It’s a very friendly and supportive environment. It may sound odd, but I felt quite “lost” when my RT finished. You’ve been fussed over and made the centre of attention for weeks on end and then suddenly it all stops and you’re on your own!

Chris

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 22:03
NS78, I agree with others that you need to make sure the oncologists involve cardiology advice in choosing treatment. But my impression is that human beings with low androgens (otherwise known as female) tend generally to be less prone to heart attacks than those with. Athough for all of us our hearts work less well eventually.

From what I understand your husband's situation is one where HT is normally thought to improve outcomes from radiotherapy. And that surgery as an alternative is more risky due to the heart condition.

And I endorse Chris's experience above, I found the radiotherapy staff very sensitive and helpful with any issues I had, and the patients form quite a supportive community after meeting daily for several weeks. It doesn't feel that bad in practice, though I was suffering a bit in my fourth week and for a few weeks afterwards.

User
Posted 31 Oct 2022 at 22:36

Thanks J-B, we’ll make sure we have all the right questions we need to ask the oncologist. We’re really concerned about the impact on his heart so we’re hoping the oncologist will be able to advise…I’m sure there are many others in the same position.

It’s good to hear you and Chris found it a supporting environment…I can imagine it does feel very lonely once it’s completed. 

My husband has been assigned a couple of support nurses which the urologist said would make contact which was 2 weeks ago now and he’s not heard anything from them yet. Is that normal or are they just there if you want to pick up the phone and ask for advice?

I’m sorry for all the questions, this is all very new to us!! 

 
Forum Jump  
12>
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK