Hi all
I just watched an interesting video cast on YouTube on the GU Cast channel.
The discussion was whether Gleason 6 should be renamed and not called cancer at all. I’ve seen similar printed articles saying the same thing too.
One of the urologists on the video said that anywhere between 30-50% of men are walking around with a Gleason 6 lesion and they won’t even be aware of it, it will never cause them any issues throughout their lives and as far as he was aware there is no evidence of any Gleason 6 spreading. They said that on a molecular level it is actually incapable of spread. One of the urologists suggested it could be the “wimpiest of all cancers”
To be fair I have also read another article that said in a study of 160 men with Gleason 6, four of them did have metastasis, so although in general it does not spread, there is a very small chance that it can…I guess.
The reason some urologists want to rename the Gleason 6 is because they feel they are over treating many men needlessly.
Pathologists on the other hand mostly all agree that Gleason 6 is definitely cancer and it is dangerous to put these men on active surveillance as there could be higher grade cancer present that was missed at the biopsy stage
The reason I’m interested is because my biopsy came back as Gleason 6 but I definitely have had some quite severe symptoms in the past 12 months.
I’ve had flow issues, frequency, pain urinating and overall genital pain.
I’m wondering if I have symptoms because my lesions were quite large (one was 27mm…is that considered large?) and they were described as PIRAD 5 after the MRI scan. The largest of the two lesions was described as having “extensive capsule contact” and I believe this is what has led them to put me in the locally advanced group and are suggesting radical treatment. After my last appointment they did say they were going to have another MDT meeting and look at my images again.
I know one thing is for sure, the symptoms of genital pain that I have cannot be ignored as they are pretty unbearable at times. For the main part they have actually reduced since my biopsy but they still come and go, right now being a “go” phase. I’m typing this in quite a lot of pain to be honest.
A question I have is, does everybody have genital pain, regardless of the Gleason score and does this diminish after treatment, either RP or RT?
I don’t suppose any of this would alter the doctors opinion that radical treatment is required and I also understand that there may be higher grade cancer present that was missed but I thought this was an interesting point of discussion.
Generally speaking are Gleason scores normally upgraded on proper pathology after removal?
I may be just writing all this down to make me feel like I’m being active with my health instead of just waiting for my next appointment.
I think it’s cathartic for me to discuss every angle but apologies if this is a useless post. Please ignore if that’s the case 😊
Take care
Greg
Edited by member 03 Apr 2023 at 16:29
| Reason: Typo