I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error


Confused by diagnosis

User
Posted 27 Mar 2024 at 23:50

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
I think my main problem dealing with AS stems from being told originally that I couldn’t go on it. This was due to my Gleason score being 7, and the fact that in her words “there’s quite a lot of cancer in there” both sides, 11 cores positive. When the second pathologist downgraded my score and recommended AS, I took it to delay the obvious side effects of treatment, but I can’t help constantly wondering which lab got it right. I suppose the rising PSA is steering my brain towards believing the first one.

In some ways, it doesn't matter which lab is right. For AS to be a good option, the info needs to suggest everything is stable and you have to feel confident that the AS is actually active and you are being surveilled! Neither of these seems to be case for you- lots of errors and confused dates and changes of heart / approach; no wonder you are losing faith. The cribriform would also worry me. As I said in the previous post, I don't think it is so urgent that you need to panic but, looking at your previous post your next appointment is in May and perhaps that is the right time to just say "nope, I want treatment please." I am not sure what help a new MRI and biopsy would be to you except if you were considering staying on AS which I don't think you are? 

My father-in-law died because his AS wasn't done properly so while I think it is the right of any man with low scores to choose AS and avoid / postpone treatment if he can, I am probably hyper-suspicious of hospitals that don't seem to do it properly. 

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 28 Mar 2024 at 00:24

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
My father-in-law died because his AS wasn't done properly

But I bet you could never prove it?

User
Posted 29 Mar 2024 at 13:16
There was no need to prove it; it was obvious and very shocking for everyone including the urologist. Fortunately, AS guidelines have been changed since then but I wouldn't like anyone else to go through the same.
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 29 Mar 2024 at 16:48

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
There was no need to prove it; it was obvious and very shocking for everyone including the urologist. Fortunately, AS guidelines have been changed since then but I wouldn't like anyone else to go through the same.

Hi Lyn,

Did you complain? Did anyone admit negligence? Was anyone held responsible? What happened to them? 

I'm still fighting my case? I obviously didn't die, but could have easily been left incurable.

 

 

Edited by member 29 Mar 2024 at 18:14  | Reason: Typo.

User
Posted 03 Apr 2024 at 16:36

So I finally spoke to the consultant today. Whilst stopping short of saying the second opinion was wrong, she admitted there was a perfectly good chance that this was the case and that we had been misled. She also informed me that my original diagnosis of 3+4=7 from Peterborough, was given after my biopsy results were reviewed by two separate Pathologists. The SMDT decided to go with the version from the other Pathologist and downgraded my score to 6!

She fully expects my PSA level to rise again by my next test in June, at which point she will get me another MRI scan done, another biopsy for re-staging, then we can talk RARP. I questioned the 3 month wait but she said to trust her, and that it would be better to have another test result to base her advice on. I have to trust her knowledge and experience here, so didn't question her further.

Very frustrating, but it looks like I should have just cracked on with treatment back in September.

User
Posted 03 Apr 2024 at 17:44

Thanks for the update Ian.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing. IF you end up having to have radical treatment you could argue that you could have done it a few months earlier BUT on the otherhand, by taking the choice you did, those 'lost months' have all been free from likely radical treatment side effects. Enjoy your further 3 months side effect free, time. Who knows, you may still not need radical treatment after that.

All the best pal.

Edited by member 03 Apr 2024 at 17:45  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 03 Apr 2024 at 21:15

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
There was no need to prove it; it was obvious and very shocking for everyone including the urologist. Fortunately, AS guidelines have been changed since then but I wouldn't like anyone else to go through the same.

Hi Lyn,

Did you complain? Did anyone admit negligence? Was anyone held responsible? What happened to them? 

I'm still fighting my case? I obviously didn't die, but could have easily been left incurable.

 

No, we had no interest in doing any of that - we just needed to understand how it happened and what the hospital would do differently in future. 

The info is on my profile but in short, Stan was on AS and his PSA dropped mysteriously - from 23 to 21 and then into single figures. We asked for new scans but these were refused - AS guidelines were that a new scan would be done if the PSA rose, not fell. We asked whether other meds (specifically, his heart meds) could cause an inexplicable drop in PSA but they said not and not to worry about it. I think in the end the PSA dropped to 2 or something like that. When he was admitted to hospital via A&E for severe oedema, a scan showed that the cancer had spread to his liver and kidneys; he died a couple of days later. It just wasn't realised that in rare cases, prostate cancer can stop producing PSA as it gets more aggressive. If we had got the scans when we asked for them, he could have started HT but the AS guidelines don't cover PSA falling - just rising.  

Edited by member 03 Apr 2024 at 21:19  | Reason: Not specified

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 03 Apr 2024 at 22:05

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
The info is on my profile but in short,

Thank you, I should have checked there first.

User
Posted 24 Jun 2024 at 23:14

Given today’s events, I thought it would be more useful to update this thread rather than the one I started last week.

After 4 consecutive rises in PSA, I was referred to a very well respected surgeon at a large clinic in Central London. 

He has overturned the “downgrading” of my diagnosis and so we are back at 3+4=7. He also said that given the high tumour volume (bilateral), and presence of Cribriform, this should have been dealt with last year, rather than me being offered AS.

He wants to do another detailed MRI this week so he knows what he’s dealing with, then pending the results of that, I am scheduled for surgery on July 17th.

The rollercoaster ride continues.

Ian.

 

Edited by member 24 Jun 2024 at 23:26  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 24 Jun 2024 at 23:42

Hello mate.

Thanks for the update. I was just about to pm you to see how the consultation had gone. 

Due to the discrepancies of your initial diagnosis, your suitability for AS was questionable. At least your in good hands now. I hope your follow up MRI scan is favourable. Did he mention having a follow up biopsy or is he going straight for the op?

User
Posted 25 Jun 2024 at 08:55

Thanks Adrian

No more biopsies, just straight for the op. Just depends what the new MRI shows I guess. Need to see what's been going on down there these last few months. Pretty pi**ed off to be fair, but as you say, I'm in good hands now. Although I did forget to check his shoes.....

User
Posted 25 Jun 2024 at 09:11

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Pretty pi**ed off to be fair, but as you say, I'm in good hands now. Although I did forget to check his shoes.....

It's understandable that you feel that way. AS is a wonderful thing when it works. According to research it works often, but you don't get that picture on here. Perhaps those who find it a success never use this site?

Please keep us updated. It'll save me bombarding you with pms.

Best of luck, buddy.

PS: The bloke in charge seems to be in command of the situation. I bet you could see your face in his shoes. 😁

User
Posted 25 Jun 2024 at 10:38

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Please keep us updated. It'll save me bombarding you with pms.

Bombard away mate, it's great to have someone to chat to 😬

User
Posted 28 Jun 2024 at 23:40

Evening all

I am now 17 days off having surgery (scan results next week permitting). I have read that I need to be as slim as is feasible, and get doing PFEs, in order to help with continence afterwards. Is there anything else I can do in advance to make my chances better?

Any advice welcomed. Thanks.

Ian.

User
Posted 29 Jun 2024 at 09:03

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
 I have read that I need to be as slim as is feasible,

Hi mate.

What I wish I'd done, on the run up to surgery, was to persuade the wife to join me in as much 'horizontal jogging' as possible.  😄

Unfortunately, post op, it maybe many months before you can 'do the biz' again, so make the best of it whilst you can. Plus, if you need to, it might help lose a pound or two.

Good luck buddy.

 

Edited by member 29 Jun 2024 at 12:14  | Reason: Typo

User
Posted 29 Jun 2024 at 11:32

Harry, do your pelvic exercises up until your op, don't do them with the catheter in is the advice I was given. A zoom support group meeting some of us attend has a physio.  She tells us to practice contracting the pelvic muscles as we go from a sitting position to a standing position. Hopefully that becomes an almost automatic action and helps reduce leaking on the way to the toilet.

I personally wouldn't make any drastic changes to my diet a few weeks before surgery, unless my surgeon told me too. It may be worth asking your medical team on that one.

Hope all goes well.

Thanks Chris 

User
Posted 01 Jul 2024 at 10:36

Adrian - i'd rather not be needing dental surgery at the same time, so may give that one a miss....

Chris - thanks. I'll be doing the PFEs from now until the 17th. I need to get organised and buy in some pads etc. I think various people have recommended Instilgel (?) as well, so will try and find some of that.

 

Cheers

Ian.

User
Posted 01 Jul 2024 at 14:01

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Adrian - i'd rather not be needing dental surgery at the same time, so may give that one a miss....

🤣

User
Posted 04 Jul 2024 at 13:49

So I had a meeting with my surgeon this morning, who has reviewed my latest MRI results. A year ago I was diagnosed with bilateral disease, but well contained within the centre of the Prostate. I then had my Gleason score downgraded (incorrectly it turns out) and was told not to worry, it is a very slow growing cancer and I would be fine on AS.

Today I was told that I have got significant anterior disease (bilateral), and as a result of it now growing all the way to the top of the Prostate, they wont be able to do Retzius sparing surgery, or save many of the nerves. Just to add the icing to the cake, I am told that I have a small bladder sphinctre (10mm) so will experience a longer than average period of incontinence after the op.

Bit gutted, but life goes on. Surgery is on the 17th, so now need to crack on with the pelvic floor exercises.

User
Posted 04 Jul 2024 at 15:20

Hello mate, I'm disappointed to hear that your disease, like mine, has appeared to have significantly progressed during AS. At least you have a date for the op and I hope that you have a speedy and full recovery.

Edited by member 05 Jul 2024 at 04:18  | Reason: Reduce text

 
Forum Jump  
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK